Hello,
We are a Main Contractor working for a local authority under a ECC NEC3 Option A. We are of the opinion there is an ambiguity between Appendix 7/9 in the Specification document and the Earthworks drawings. The Specification document forms part of the Works Information.
Appendix 7/9 states “cold miling required to a constant depth”. The drawings referenced are the Earthworks drawings which show 20mm excavation on footways. No cold milling is shown on these drawings and no other drawings are referenced in App 7/9.
Our argument is this is an ambiguity between the said documents which needs to be clarified under Cl17.1. App 7/9 states one method but the drawings stated another method. Cold milling to a constant depth is also impossible in footways due to the amount of obstructions present such as ironwork, garden walls, bushes, street furniture etc.
PM counter argument is App 7/9 only refers to Series 700 therefore the statement in the appendix is redundant. PM does accept the Earthworks drawing has been incorrectly referenced in the appendix but still argues the statement is irrelevant as no cold milling is shown in the Earthworks drawing.
Can someone please advise?