NEC Option A Contract.
A PMI and CE was raised several months ago and the contractor submitted a quotation which was rejected with notes as to why, a revised quote was submitted which did not address all matters, this was again rejected and a revised quote requested again. A meeting was held to discuss the points raised and principles were generally agreed. The revised (third) quote was then awaited from the Contractor.
Whilst the 3rd quotation was awaited the Contractors intended sub-contractor entered administration and was no longer able to undertake the works. An alternative has been lined up but is more expensive and the Contractors revised quotation is based on the new sub-contractor.
I appreciate that the principal of NEC is to effectively reimburse the Contractor for the costs incurred where the works change, but this would also effectively mean that the client has taken the risk for the sub-contractor insolvency and also as a result of the initial quotations not being acceptable.
The question therefore is when the contractor is basing a quotation on forecast costs should this forecast be based at the date the CE was raised (or the first quote should have been submitted) in which case it would be based on the original (cheaper) sub-contractor or should it be based at the date that the (3rd) quotation was produced?