Can a contractor base their claim (of extension of time and expense) only on the delays that were notified to the employer not on everything in retrospect? Or can the courts still take all circumstances into account and make a judgement on that?
Is a ‘certified practical completion’ the same as a ‘date for completion’?
If the contractor submits an early target programme but experiences a series of delays. Would you examine the extent of overall delay by original programme or the early programme they submitted?
Any help would be much appreciated. Only recently been introduced to this type of contract!