Yes, in fact there is a very strict timetable regarding adjudication that must be obeyed. The basic time periods involved in adjudication are covered by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, but the Scheme for Construction Contracts (England and Wales) Regulations 1998 may add additional time to the timetable.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Should time be considered 'of the essence' in construction contracts? | 1 | 453 | 5 February 2013 | |
| How long after practical completion can one party decide to use arbitration | 2 | 1704 | 20 April 2015 | |
| Do late adjudication decisions retain validity? | 1 | 845 | 6 February 2013 | |
| With regard to construction contracts, what can be inferred by the term 'reasonable time'? | 1 | 425 | 4 February 2013 | |
| When undertaking an JCT Standard Building Contract 2009 contract, an architect approves a contractor's programme, with the completion date indicated post-dating the contract completion date by two months. Should the architect work towards the new date? | 1 | 359 | 4 February 2013 |