Under JCT Standard Building Contract 2009, if the 12 week review period has passed without the contractor issuing documents to the architect, is it legally permissible for a further extension of time to be granted?

JCT_Experts · 5 February 2013 15:47

JCT Standard Building Contract 2009: Is it permissible for the architect to give a further extension of time if documents from the contractor have not been received until after the end of the 12 weeks’ review period?

Recent legislative decisions have indicated that if a contractor submits information once the 12 week period has expired then the architect is not able to take this information into consideration. Even if the information is provided on time, an extension of time will result.

Topic		Replies	Views
With regards to JCT Standard Building Contract 2009, if an architect submits an instruction after the scheduled completion date, is the contractor entitled to an extension, and if so for how long? JCT Contracts	1	461	5 February 2013
When operating under JCT Standard Building Contract 2009, should an architect not be furnished with the necessary delay information until a week before the due completion date, is there any leeway regarding a time extension being issued before the complet JCT Contracts	1	357	5 February 2013
What is an architect's legal course of action if a contractor fails to provide final documents within the time period contractually specified, after practical completion has taken place? JCT Contracts	1	429	5 February 2013
If there is an extension of time, is the architect obliged to give an in-depth explanation of this to the contractor? JCT Contracts	1	352	5 February 2013
JCT Extensions of Time JCT Contracts jct	2	643	4 January 2022

Under JCT Standard Building Contract 2009, if the 12 week review period has passed without the contractor issuing documents to the architect, is it legally permissible for a further extension of time to be granted?

Related Topics