I am working on an NEC 3 Option A contract.
The project manager issued an instruction changing the works information. The contractor has submitted a quotation including a programme (cl62.2) showing a change to Planned Completion.
The Contractor used the accepted cl32 programme and progressed that programme up to the switch date i.e. the date the instruction was given. This programme then became the baseline programme for the assessment.
Following a review of the submitted programme (cl62.2), it has become apparent that there is an error in the accepted cl32 programme used to establish the baseline programme i.e. the calculated time period between completion of the steelwork design to when it is required on site (Erection) is insufficient to allow for procurement, fabrication and delivery - Note there is no individual activities in the programme to represent procurement, fabrication and delivery. Erection of Steelwork is on the critical path, therefore, in reality the accepted cl32 programme should show that the contractor was in delay.
If the time period between completion of the steelwork design to when it is required on site (Erection) was amended to allow for procurement, fabrication and delivery, on the baseline programme, when the compensation event activities are then included there would be no impact on “critical path” activities and thus there would be no change to planned completion.
It is my understanding that the Contractor should be not better off, had the compensation event not occurred.
Can the accepted programme be amended to reflect the “actual position” of the contractor at the time the instruction was given?