I am working on an ECC option C contract. I have received a prolongation claim from the Main Contractor. The background to the claim is as follows:
Phase 1 works were progressing as planned. Phase 2 works (which are part of the overall scheme but under a separate contract) were scheduled to commence towards the latter part of phase 1 works – an overlap of 104 days, thus inviting a saving on prelim costs (even though phase 2 was a separate contract). Due to employer delays, phase 2 works did not start until 11.5 weeks later.
As part of his evaluation, the Main Contractor has merely used his weekly prelim cost that was being incurred during phase 1 works (when there would have been an
overlap) and multiplied this by 11.5 weeks.
My contention is that whilst the delay period off 11.5 weeks is correct the calculation should be based on phase 2 prelims (not phase 1) as it is phase 2 works that were delayed. The sticking point however is the saving that would have been made by the Contractor as a result of the overlap. This has now been lost and the Contractor is incurring full prelim costs in the last 11.5 weeks of the phase 2 works.
What is the correct method of calculating the prolongation cost, especially in light of the fact that phase 2 was a separate contract but prelim costs would have been less had works coincided with phase 1 works (which was the original plan), but which were under a different contract?