A building owner has proposed changes to a planned building that an architect knows would be refused by a Planning Department. Should the architect continue with the drawings and fulfil the contract?

JCT_Experts · 5 February 2013 11:05

In such a circumstance it would be the architect’s duty to inform the building owner that their proposal is unlawful. To do otherwise would be contrary to the architect’s Code of Conduct and could have serious repercussions for all parties involved.

Topic		Replies	Views
Is it legally permissible for a contractor to refuse to go along with an architect's instruction which necessitates the acceptance of a quotation performed by a sub-contractor who has been chosen by the architect? JCT Contracts	1	393	5 February 2013
Once an architect has improved a contractor's programme, is it possible for a contractor to alter it without informing the architect, and does the architect have the legal right to demand an update? JCT Contracts	1	418	4 February 2013
Once a building has been successfully constructed, is there any onus on the architect to continue to check the design? JCT Contracts	1	456	5 February 2013
If an architect delegates defective design to a sub-contractor, can this allow the architect to escape liability? JCT Contracts	1	391	5 February 2013
Is it legally possible for a client to prevent an architect from allowing an extension of time? JCT Contracts	1	501	5 February 2013

A building owner has proposed changes to a planned building that an architect knows would be refused by a Planning Department. Should the architect continue with the drawings and fulfil the contract?

Related topics