|
Dispute avoidance
|
|
1
|
923
|
9 January 2017
|
|
Is a "collateral warranty" a "construction contract" under the HGCR Act?
|
|
2
|
1189
|
20 April 2015
|
|
Appointment of Adjudicator - when adjudicator is named in Contract
|
|
2
|
1089
|
28 February 2015
|
|
Time Assessment of sub-contractor additional work after the event
|
|
4
|
1209
|
23 February 2015
|
|
LDEDC Act 2009 disputes under oral contracts
|
|
1
|
1021
|
9 July 2014
|
|
LDEDC Act 2009 construction contract in writing
|
|
1
|
1057
|
9 July 2014
|
|
What are disruption claims?
|
|
1
|
1020
|
15 January 2014
|
|
If there are extenuating circumstances that delay a tender, is the court required to extend the deadline?
|
|
1
|
862
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Are there any circumstances under which a deadline for a tender may be extended?
|
|
1
|
749
|
18 January 2013
|
|
How should all main elements of a tender be submitted?
|
|
1
|
768
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Can partially completed tenders qualify for consideration?
|
|
1
|
821
|
18 January 2013
|
|
In relation to the Tekcal exemption, are local authorities required to follow any particular legal form?
|
|
1
|
663
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Is there a legislative example which confirms the Tekcal exemption?
|
|
1
|
698
|
18 January 2013
|
|
What is meant by 'Tekcal exemption'?
|
|
1
|
852
|
18 January 2013
|
|
For which cases do transitional provisions apply?
|
|
1
|
673
|
18 January 2013
|
|
How long does the economic operator have to serve the claim form with regard to court proceedings involved with the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011?
|
|
1
|
798
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Can a court grant an extension to the 30 day period for court proceedings referred to in the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011?
|
|
1
|
749
|
18 January 2013
|
|
When does the 30 day period for court proceedings referred to in the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011 begin?
|
|
1
|
666
|
18 January 2013
|
|
What was the effect of the Public Procurement (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011, with regards to the general time limit within which economic operators must start any court proceedings which they wish to take under the regulations?
|
|
1
|
618
|
18 January 2013
|
|
With regard to the three month time limit to bring a claim imposed by regulation 47, what are the requirements of the court?
|
|
1
|
574
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Does a local authority have discretion or 'margin of appreciation' in relation to its compliance with its obli/gations of equal treatment and transparency?
|
|
1
|
608
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Is there a general duty to investigate 'suspect' tenders that appear abnormally low?
|
|
1
|
876
|
18 January 2013
|
|
With regards to disclosure, what does Regulation 30 require?
|
|
1
|
629
|
18 January 2013
|
|
With regard to a contracting authority applying weightings, rules or sub criteria that it has not previously brought to the attention of tenderers, how is 'transparency' in this matter defined?
|
|
1
|
601
|
18 January 2013
|
|
Can a contracting authority cannot apply weightings, rules or sub criteria that it has not previously brought to the tenderers?
|
|
1
|
635
|
18 January 2013
|
|
When Selection Criteria and Award Criteria are carried out separately, what must employers ask of a tenderer?
|
|
1
|
635
|
18 January 2013
|
|
What was the European Court of Justice ruling with regards to 'Selection Criteria' and 'Award Criteria'?
|
|
1
|
718
|
18 January 2013
|
|
When should information regarding the criteria, and their relative importance, that the contracting authority will use to identify the most economically advantageous offer be made available to all potential tenderers?
|
|
1
|
607
|
18 January 2013
|
|
What does Article 36(2) of Directive 92/50 require of potential tenderers?
|
|
1
|
603
|
18 January 2013
|
|
What was the outcome of the European Court of Justice ruling with regards to the case ATI EAC [2005] ECR I-10109?
|
|
1
|
720
|
18 January 2013
|