# Why might the access date be after the start date?

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/why-might-the-access-date-be-after-the-start-date/1120>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [20 November 2012 14:13 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/why-might-the-access-date-be-after-the-start-date/1120 "2012-11-20T14:13:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rob\_Glasspool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a88e57/32.png) [@Rob\_Glasspool](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/Rob_Glasspool)\
**Post date:** [20 November 2012 14:13 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/why-might-the-access-date-be-after-the-start-date/1120/1 "2012-11-20T14:13:05Z")

</div>

Why might the access date be after the start date?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rob\_Glasspool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a88e57/32.png) [@Rob\_Glasspool](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/Rob_Glasspool)\
**Post date:** [20 November 2012 14:15 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/why-might-the-access-date-be-after-the-start-date/1120/2 "2012-11-20T14:15:36Z")

</div>

Because access to or possession of The Site may not be required if design and fabrication is done off site, after the start date but before the first access date.