# Sectional Completion Date (X5)

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/sectional-completion-date-x5/17728>\
**Category:** NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts\
**Created:** [28 April 2022 10:13 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/sectional-completion-date-x5/17728 "2022-04-28T10:13:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QS007](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/qs007/32/173_2.png) [@QS007](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/QS007)\
**Post date:** [28 April 2022 10:13 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/sectional-completion-date-x5/17728/1 "2022-04-28T10:13:44Z")

</div>

NEC 3 - Option B

Our agreement with a Subcontractor has a Sectional Completion date titled ’ All materials delivered to site’ with delay damages being applied (X7).

The Subcontractor is late, around 90 days, on that S/C date as it stands **but** , there has been an instruction sent by the Contractor requesting more material which is additional scope.

The Subcontractor is claiming in their CE that their S/C must be changed to when they can deliver this new material, which is the date of the instruction + lead times.

if correct, this means that their 90 days is cleared and their lateness for the previous material is forgotten. Is that correct ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dave\_bates](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/dave_bates/32/55_2.png) [@dave\_bates](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/dave_bates)\
**Post date:** [30 April 2022 20:18 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/sectional-completion-date-x5/17728/2 "2022-04-30T20:18:17Z")

</div>

The Sectional Completion date needs amending to reflect the instructed additional scope. The adjustment should be a reasonable period to carry out the procurement plus the lead times. The adjustment being added to the Sectional Completion date.