# Release Notes up to 2025-06-07 Contract Management Sprint 117

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/release-notes-up-to-2025-06-07-contract-management-sprint-117/22350>\
**Category:** Product Release Notes\
**Tags:** fastdraft\
**Created:** [10 June 2025 08:16 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/release-notes-up-to-2025-06-07-contract-management-sprint-117/22350 "2025-06-10T08:16:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![liz\_exley](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/liz_exley/32/623_2.png) [@liz\_exley](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/liz_exley)\
**Post date:** [10 June 2025 08:16 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/release-notes-up-to-2025-06-07-contract-management-sprint-117/22350/1 "2025-06-10T08:16:02Z")

</div>

This release contains a couple of improvements and some bug fixes.

## \* New + Improved

## \* New

We have added new configurable reply capability to the following workflows.

- Improved handling of document uploads to avoid UI prematurely reporting success.
- Switched to using singular Page Title in the Create New and Create Related dropdown, previously this was plural.
- For system-generated reply actions, the new Actions panel now works the same as the old Actions panel (i.e. clicking a system-generated action will open the item (even if you are not the replying party).

## \* Bug fixes

We have corrected the following;

- When Task Order/Project Order is created from RFP/ITQ Proposal, the asset fields were not pre-populated [only relevant to one of our customers)
- The reply options in the dropdown for a proposed instruction, specifically whether the contractor can proceed or not, was not pulling through from the contract template.
