# Programme in Contract Data incorrect **URL:** \ **Category:** NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts\ **Created:** [5 July 2022 14:54 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/programme-in-contract-data-incorrect/18136 "2022-07-05T14:54:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![QS007](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/qs007/32/173_2.png) [@QS007](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/QS007)\ **Post date:** [12 July 2022 07:19 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/programme-in-contract-data-incorrect/18136/4 "2022-07-12T07:19:57Z")
My answer is no, the programme which contained the error has been accepted and is your Accepted Programme. The solution maybe for the Project Manager to instruct you to submit a revised programme detailing what the requirements are or wait until the next submission. What you can do when creating your CEQ programme is take into account all that has happened since the dividing date, including the error, and see what happens to the critical path / Completion Dates. Here are some good links which may support your query ? > [@NEC4 ECC errors in Accepted Programme](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/nec4-ecc-errors-in-accepted-programme/16129): > > If there is an error in the Accepted Programme e.g. the Contractor did not include some key activities that were in the Scope. Should the Project Manager use clause 17.1 to notify the inconsistencies and instruct to revise the programme due to these errors or just instruct the Contractor to revise the programme under clause 32 suffice? > [@NEC ECC: What happens to an Accepted Programme if the Project Manager and Contractor realise there is an error on it?](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/nec-ecc-what-happens-to-an-accepted-programme-if-the-project-manager-and-contractor-realise-there-is-an-error-on-it/4724): > > What happens to the Accepted Programme if both the Project Manager and Contractor realise there is an error on it? > [@NEC3 ECC: Assessing extention of time entitlement from "incorrect" programme](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/nec3-ecc-assessing-extention-of-time-entitlement-from-incorrect-programme/3723): > > We have an accepted programme with incorrect logic that contains a number of access dates. These access dates have now been delayed When accessing the delay entitlement do we just amend the access dates, progress the programme and claim for the delay generated by the programme, or do we need to amend the access dates and correct the erroneous logic? --- _[View the full topic](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/programme-in-contract-data-incorrect/18136)._