# If the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 is used does this negate the need to Collateral Warranties?

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/if-the-contracts-rights-of-third-parties-act-1999-is-used-does-this-negate-the-need-to-collateral-warranties/4331>\
**Category:** Secondary X, W and Y options\
**Created:** [2 November 2017 11:50 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/if-the-contracts-rights-of-third-parties-act-1999-is-used-does-this-negate-the-need-to-collateral-warranties/4331 "2017-11-02T11:50:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/system/32/1709_2.png) [@system](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [2 November 2017 11:50 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/if-the-contracts-rights-of-third-parties-act-1999-is-used-does-this-negate-the-need-to-collateral-warranties/4331/1 "2017-11-02T11:50:25Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jon\_Broome](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/jon_broome/32/192_2.png) [@Jon\_Broome](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/Jon_Broome)\
**Post date:** [2 November 2017 12:05 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/if-the-contracts-rights-of-third-parties-act-1999-is-used-does-this-negate-the-need-to-collateral-warranties/4331/2 "2017-11-02T12:05:13Z")

</div>

In theory ‘Yes’ as they serve the same purpose. As always, there are pros & cons to either approach which you need to match to your circumstances.