# Contract Data part one: Risks and Insurance

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/contract-data-part-one-risks-and-insurance/20284>\
**Category:** Risk and Insurance\
**Tags:** nec\
**Created:** [5 April 2023 12:19 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/contract-data-part-one-risks-and-insurance/20284 "2023-04-05T12:19:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brian](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/brian/32/1259_2.png) [@Brian](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/Brian)\
**Post date:** [5 April 2023 12:19 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/contract-data-part-one-risks-and-insurance/20284/1 "2023-04-05T12:19:51Z")

</div>

In Contract Data part one under Risks and Insuranace an Employer has correctly written in the minimum limits of indemity they require for a Project. However, they have also written in a maximum amount of “policy excess” for each of the Insurances, including zero in one case. Is it OK for the Employer to specify this or it is purely a matter for the Contractor provided they can demonstrate the minimum levels of cover?