# Clarification of form of contract

**URL:** <https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/clarification-of-form-of-contract/3122>\
**Category:** SOCC SSOCC\
**Created:** [4 February 2014 13:58 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/clarification-of-form-of-contract/3122 "2014-02-04T13:58:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/system/32/1709_2.png) [@system](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [4 February 2014 13:58 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/clarification-of-form-of-contract/3122/1 "2014-02-04T13:58:45Z")

</div>

JJon  
Not sure where the reference to TSC came from, it was not in the original question. It is an ECC.  
Your view on the status of the rates submitted are of interest, I will convey this to my counterpart at the Contractor, his current view was that as it was not carried forward into the executed subcontract document, including the inaugural minutes the rates have no standing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jon\_Broome](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/reachback.builtintelligence.com/jon_broome/32/192_2.png) [@Jon\_Broome](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/u/Jon_Broome)\
**Post date:** [4 February 2014 14:16 UTC](https://reachback.builtintelligence.com/t/clarification-of-form-of-contract/3122/2 "2014-02-04T14:16:23Z")

</div>

It was in the title “TSC information … …”  
TSC = Term Services Contract in my limited world of NEC !