Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

5,868 questions

6,316 answers


Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: When a Project Manager rejects a programme which clause do they use to notify the Contractor? 13.4 or 13.7?

0 votes
Can anyone provide some clarity on the difference if any if the PM were to use either of these clauses to notify rejection of the submitted programme?
asked Jan 10 in Time by simsai (120 points)  

1 Answer

0 votes
Neither - those clauses state the rules on which the response should be given i.e. that it has to be responded to, if rejected clear reasons why it is rejected and that the communication has to be separate from other communications. The clause that should be referenced in the response for rejection of a programme is clause 31.3, for which there are four reasons they can reject.

It is worth pointing out that NEC4 now says if the Project Manager is rejecting a submission, they should state the reasons why IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR TO CORRECT THE SUBMISSION (the capitalised bit being the new additional words). This makes it clear they have to give specific reasons why rejecting to allow them to correct it, not giving high level reasons e.g. your programme is not realistic.
answered Jan 10 by Glenn Hide Panel Member (87,180 points)  
Thanks Glenn

I think my question wasn't clear, I get that 31.3 is that clause that should be used to reject but which of the clauses are used to communicate that rejection? Can the PM communicate using either?
13.4 and 13.7 are just the rules around that communication. Most projects now used a cloud based system to manage their flow of communication e.g. FastDraft and within that system there will be a response form built in to respond to any type of communication under the contract.