Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

5,868 questions

6,316 answers


Register its Free

Download here

NEC PSC: Lack of Completion Date in CD part 1 and Part 2 - Is this an Issue?

0 votes
Regarding an NEC3 2013 PSC Contract.

Its the Start of a Contract.

1. The Employer has not used in CDpt1  the statement "The completion date for the whole of the services is..."
2. The Employer has used Option X5 which indicates Sectional Completion for 4 x sections of works.
3. The Employer has included in CD Part 2 the optional statement "The programme identified in the Contract Data is.." - A programme has been supplied with the consultants tender which has not yet been accepted (under review).  
4. The Employer has not included in CDpt 2 the statement "The completion date for the whole of the services is..."

The Consultant is advising the Employer that they are concerned there is no Completion Date in CDpt 1 and is advising the Employer that the Employer should be  issuing a variation of the contract to include the  statement regarding a completion date into CD pt 1 to enable the proper management of the Contract.

Is the Consultant right?
asked Oct 17, 2019 in NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts by JDa1983 (120 points)  

1 Answer

+1 vote
The first question that hasn't been asked is how does either party sign up to a contract where they have both allowed this to happen with no identified Completion date? Should be pretty fundamental to want/need to have in place. If there wasn't one stated in CD1, the Consultant should have offered one in CD2.

The only saving grace here would be if within the four sectional completion dates that you said you have, is the last sectional Completion Date in effect "the  remainder of the works" in which case that is in effect the Completion Date. If not, then yes there would need to be some kind of legal variation to ascertain what the Completion Date is that would have to be mutually agreed. Delay damages under X7 can't be applied against a Completion Date that hasn't been fixed!
answered Oct 17, 2019 by Glenn Hide Panel Member (87,180 points)