Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

5,315 questions

5,695 answers

1,260 comments

Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECS: Option A - Add & Omit resulting Negative CE and Fee % is resulting in an overall loss

0 votes
230 views
Can you give back something you never had in the first place?

Item 1 at £50k: Included in tender with agreed tender fee of 5%

Compensation Event:

Omit Item 1 at 50K using SSCC with Sub-subcon fee percentage of  12.5% (loss!)
Add  Item 2 of 25k using SSCC with Direct fee percentage of  8%

Tender        50000    5%        2500
Omit           -50000    12.5%    -6250 (never had this  to give back in the first place)
Add            25000    8%        2000
           
Nett            -25000    17%       -4250

Surely this isn't right or fair....

My automatic assumption is that only the tender fee is omitted and the agreed fee percentage is added back.

Any comments would be useful.

Thanks,
asked Sep 24 in Compensation Events by beastyboi81 (120 points)  

1 Answer

0 votes
I think - and I stress 'think' - your overall logic is correct and 'Yes' it is potentially unfair if the prices that you have out forward in your Activity Schedule at tender do not approximately equal your Defined Costs + relevant Fee.

Let me query two things though:
- where does the "agreed tender fee" of 5% come from ? No idea as not in NEC and seems very low, probably not even or only just covering head office overheads with no profit  ... so why did you agree to it ?
- by contrast direct fee percentage of 12.5% is on the high side wrt the average contractor's overheads and profit. Presumably you are not complaining when compensation events occur which increase the Defined Costs on Sub-subcontracts ?

The difference between these two percentages creates an imbalance which is leads to the perceived unfairness.
answered Sep 25 by Jon Broome Panel Member (59,440 points)  
Thanks for your comment,

I'm going to body swerve the question on the 'tender fee' origin and blame it on the infinite wisdom possessed by the commercial negotiators higher up the food chain.

This is the first significant CE on two identical scheme and will set the precedent for future CE's so I want to get it right. If we are forced to stick with the principle demonstrated above, I'm just hoping the overall change to the cost is a positive one!

Ultimately my question is, is it unacceptable or wrong to mix and match these percentages? i.e. Omit at 'tender fee' of 5% and add back using agreed fee of 8% direct and 12.5% subcon.

Many thanks,
My answer is that, unless there is something in the option Z clauses, the 5% is not a contractual amount, so your fee percentages of 8% and 12.5% should be applied both to uplifts to the Prices and reduced Prices, if allowable under the contract i.e. changes to the Works Information and changed PM assumptions.