Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
Ask a Question
is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by
. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.
Health and Safety
Legal and Disputes
NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts
Testing and Defects
Risk and Insurance
Secondary X, W and Y options
Planning and Architecture
Register its Free
NEC ECC: Does an early warning warrant some kind of response?
A number of early warnings were issued to the PM over a period of about 6 months. The PM failed to address the risks stated in the early warnings. He did not provide a response in writing nor did he attend the weekly risk reduction meetings for the stated period. The PM cancelled the risk meetings a day before it was scheduled.
The early warnings relate to free issue material supplied by the PM. The Contractor's records indicate that not all material was issued. The PM on the other hand believe that everything was issued and that the Contractor lost material according to the PM's records.
The project will be delayed and the PM is attempting to shift all the blame to the Contractor. The delays would have been mitigated if the PM responded timely to the early warnings.
Does an early warning warrant a response, either in writing or during risk reduction meeting?
What recourse does the Contractor have should the risks go unattended to by the PM? Notify a CE?
to add a comment.
to answer this question.
You have slightly confused two different processes here. If you had reason to believe they might not be providing enough material, you could have notified an early warning. That should have prompted a risk reduction meeting (early warning meeting now under NEC4) to discuss whether that could be an issue and what could be done about it and agree the actions going forward.
As soon as the Contractor KNOWS they have not been issued all of the material they should notify that as a compensation event. The PM would then have to respond within a week if they agree it is a CE or not. If yes they then request the quotation which will include the assessment of any time affects as well.
Your original question is do they have to respond to an early warning. So taking that as a question (As what you have listed here I don't think was an early warning really) then strictly speaking no they do not have to respond to an early warning. However, they would be pretty stupid not to as discussing it at a meeting could then avoid that problem becoming a problem at all or at least mitigate its effects in someway. The Contractor even has the power to instruct a risk reduction meeting - and if the PM does not attend then they have lost the chance to mitigate the situation.
If a Contractor notifies an early warning, instructs a meeting but the PM ignores both, the risk to the Client is that this may now cause an issue that you cant avoid that may also then be a compensation event which would then cost more money than it might have.
to add a comment.
Want to improve your knowledge?
Try one of our Free Trials in NEC3, NEC4, JCT or Procurement!
Order answers by