Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
Ask a Question
is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by
. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.
Health and Safety
Legal and Disputes
NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts
Testing and Defects
Risk and Insurance
Secondary X, W and Y options
Planning and Architecture
Register its Free
NEC3 ECC - Option B - CESMM Filling v Backfilling Payment Working Space
Contract: NEC3 Option B Amended
Issue: CESMM 4 Backfill around Foundations
Firstly I think this is more of an issue with measurement potentially than Contract however if anyone can assist it would be appreciated.
The Subcontractor has raised an issue of payment surrounding the backfill around foundations. The issue as follows:
1. The subcontractor is to construct foundations
2. The subcontractor has excavated their working area
3. The ground they have excavated for their working space is unsuitable for backfill
4. The Site Information shows made ground unsuitable to be reused as backfill is present in the areas from borehole information
5. Specification in the Works Information states that any unsuitable backfill material is to be replaced with type 1 sub base
6. The Subcontractor is now claiming for the material cost for bringing in Type 1 material
My query is that under CESMM 4 the cost of working space excavation and backfill deemed necessary for the installation of the structure is included within the excavation rate under coverage rule 1 of Class E. However the issue here is that imported material is required rather than the as dug material for backfilling of the working space. As this was known at the time of tender should this have been included in the rates or should it have been a separate BOQ item of filling imported material even though the specification in the Works Information and Site Information allows for this to be known?
Under option A this would not be an issue however the measurement under Option B has caused this.
Aug 15, 2019
to add a comment.
to answer this question.
the issue of excavating and backfilling work space is a matter for the Contractor to consider and include within its rates. If it is clear that imported material will be required then that should have been allowed for. I have assume that the Contractor is not seeking a cl 60.1(12) CE.
Aug 16, 2019
to add a comment.
Want to improve your knowledge?
Try one of our Free Trials in NEC3, NEC4, JCT or Procurement!
Order answers by