Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
Ask a Question
is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by
. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.
Health and Safety
Legal and Disputes
NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts
Testing and Defects
Risk and Insurance
Secondary X, W and Y options
Planning and Architecture
Register its Free
NEC ECS: Error in BOQ and MoM description
The BoQ for an NEC3 ECC Option B contract for reinforced concrete works has an item for 20no reinforcement couplers, which the Subcontractor has priced. The method of measurement (MCHW May 2009) actually includes 'mechanical fixings' (ie couplers) as an item coverage for 'reinforcement'. Therefore this is an issue that cl 60.6 should address as it is a departure from the rules for items descriptions and there should never have been a separate line for couplers.
As well as that issue, the actual number of couplers was far higher (a few hundred). There were also couplers used on another structure, but none of these were included in the BoQ.
My interpretation of how to deal with it is that we instruct via cl17.1/60.6 correcting the BOQ which will remove the 'rogue' description, and cl 60.7 says that the subcontractor has assumed the BoQ is correct and therefore we still pay for the 20no couplers but no more, ie their quotation is zero value. Cl 60.7 doesn't give them license to claim that they didn't include for 'mechanical fixings' in the rest of their reinforcement rates does it?
We interpret that the Subcontractor has included for 'mechanical connections' within their rate, as per the MoM, which covers the couplers they have installed.
Is this correct? The subcontractor is saying that they 'didn't include mechanical fixings in their rate' (although there are no exclusions in their contract) and therefore should be paid for all of the couplers via re-measure (for those in the BOQ) and CE for those that weren't included..
Feb 5, 2019
to add a comment.
to answer this question.
I believe you are taking a reasonable approach, the only question I would ask is whether the drawings and/or rebar schedules detailed the couplers. If so then the Subcontractor had the information to be able to price.
The wider question it raises is if the MoM does not prescribe couplers to be separately itemised then how do you measure them since there will be no measurement rules!
Feb 8, 2019
Thanks for the response Dave. To answer your question, yes the couplers were on the schedules/drawings and therefore so the s/c had the information to be able to price. There is a statement in the MOM that says 'no allowance shall be made for the mass of welds and mechanical connections' so in essence they are not measured.
Feb 9, 2019
to add a comment.
Want to improve your knowledge?
Try one of our Free Trials in NEC3, NEC4, JCT or Procurement!
Order answers by