Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
Ask a Question
is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by
. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.
Health and Safety
Legal and Disputes
NEC3 and NEC4 Contracts
Testing and Defects
Risk and Insurance
Secondary X, W and Y options
Planning and Architecture
Register its Free
NEC TSSC: Termination
TSSC clause 90.1 states “if either party wishes to terminate the Contractor’s obligation to Provide the Service, he notifies the other Party giving details of his reason for terminating.”
If the Employer proposes to terminate for Reason 5 (any other reason) does any further detail on the reason need to be given or is using the term “any other reason” all that is required?
to add a comment.
Want to improve your skills? Register for one of our Free Trials
Click here to learn new skills in NEC3, NEC4, JCT, and Procurement!
to answer this question.
Whilst it would be good practice for the Employer to explain the reason in more detail than just quoting the term "any other reason", strictly the contract doesn't require this. Technically the Employer might be in breach of clause 10.1 i.e. absence of a detailed explanation of the reason is a failure to co-operate effectively with the Contractor, however this argument doesn't really take you anywhere from a commercial point of view.
The only other argument I could think of would be to claim the Employer's termination isn't in accordance with the contract (but as already discussed, is it really?) and that it amounts to repudiation. Again though this doesn't take you to a better place commercially and the contract won't become un-terminated.
Remember that because the Employer chose reason 5 you will recover "5% of any excess of a forecast of the amount due ..." which is intended to be a sweetener for the inconvenience you've been caused as you weren't in breach of contract.
to add a comment.
Order answers by