Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

4,952 questions

5,279 answers

1,043 comments

Register its Free

Download here

NEC PSC: When would a PSC Option G contract be the right procurement approach?

0 votes
444 views
I'm interested in understanding more about the Option G form of contract:
 - What adv does this form have over others (for the Employer)?
 - What disadv does this form have over others (for the Employer)?
 - In what situation would you recommend an Option G Main Clause?

If I understand correctly, the Employer provides a Task Schedule to which the Consultant offers a lump sum against each Task.  When under contract, the Employer instructs the Consultant to undertake a Task, by issuing a Task Order.  From what I can work out the only difference between this and an Option A is that the Employer retains some control as to the work that is being undertaken through the contract.
asked Oct 28, 2018 in Main options by aedane1 (120 points)  
I can’t see there being any difference between the two options in the control available to the Employer.

Option A would appear to me to be suited to a service for single specific project where the overall scope can be clearly defined and Option G would appear to be suited to potential services on a programme of potential projects where the scope of individual service sub-elements can be clearly defined but the number of each isn’t known.

An Option A example might be the engagement of an architect by an Employer for the design and project management of the construction of a building.

An Option G example might be the engagement of an architect by a developer for a range of potential design and project management services as and when development opportunities arise during the term, where some don’t proceed beyond outline proposals, planning or don’t make it to site.

1 Answer

0 votes
Option G of the PSC is for use when the Employer can define the type of services they require, but not the quantity. As you rightly describe the Employer provides a Task Schedule that the Consultant prices. As and when the Employer wants to call-off some of the service, they issue a Task Order.

The main benefit of Option G is that it enables the Employer to enter into a binding contract that gives price certainty for the defined services. It's similar to a framework contract in terms of how it operates. I wouldn't recommend Option G is used for calling-off services that are of high value or complexity as the Task Order procedures are quite simple. If the services require more sophisticated management then a framework contract with a call-off mechanism that uses Options A, C or E would be more appropriate.
answered Nov 21, 2018 by Neil Earnshaw (20,050 points)