Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

5,737 questions

6,154 answers


Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Labour Agencies - 'People' or 'Subcontractor'

0 votes
We are currently in dispute with a Client on an Option E. At FA stage (great timing!) he has now stated that labour agencies are in fact subcontractors and not People (14), therefore WAO% does not apply. I believe him not to be correct in his statement. What do you reckon?
 I believe that People 14 covers labour agencies correctly and that the definition of subcontractors does not apply to labour agencies.
asked Sep 19, 2018 in Time by Jonathan Atwall (220 points)  

1 Answer

+2 votes
Labour only supplier falls outside of the definition of a "Subcontractor" within clause 11.2. NEC4 makes it very clear that is the case with a rewording of the definition, but NEC3 definition already makes it pretty clear.  

The NEC3 guidance notes for this clause clearly state "Labour-only subcontractors are not Subcontractors under this definition".
answered Sep 19, 2018 by Glenn Hide Panel Member (84,270 points)  
Agreeing with Glenn, there is a very simple test to apply, did the labour only supplier take on responsibility for quality of work or an aspect of delivery over and above providing labour to the site. If the answer is yes they did take a broader responsibility then they may be a subcontractor (as they probably aren't actually labour only supplier) if not then they cannot realistically be a subcontractor.

To the extent there is any doubt in the contract (and there is a little in NEC3 at least) this test should avoid it.