Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

Do you want to update your skills in NEC3, NEC4, JCT, Procurement, CDM or Project management?

Sign up for one of our free online courses.

4,665 questions

4,944 answers

852 comments

Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Change in the WI between tender and construction - what should have been allowed for

0 votes
233 views
At tender the WI (drawings) included a note regarding "drainage connections will be rationalised during construction where possible".  The connections shown were into the main combined sewer for which the utility drawings indicated that this was some 5m or so deep.  

After issuing the Construction Issue drawings this note was removed and as it turns out all of the new road drainage has been able to make use of the existing gully tails, removing the need for these deep excavations and connections.

Should the Contractor have allowed for the deep connections at tender stage or is it reasonable for him to claim that due to the note regarding rationalisation that no deep connections where necessary so were not included in the total of the Prices at tender?
asked Apr 25 in NEC3 Compensation Events by LA1 (690 points)  

1 Answer

+1 vote
 
Best answer
I think the note is irrelevant as it is so vague.

The Contractor should have priced for what was shown on the drawings. The issue of the  rationalised construction drawings are a change to the WI which would presumably result in a negative compensation event which reduces the Prices as it is easier to construct.

This assumes that the construction drawings were issued post-contract.

However, if I was a Contractor I would be pointing at clause 63.8 !
answered Apr 26 by Jon Broome (48,040 points)  
selected May 10 by Glenn Hide