Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

4,796 questions

5,109 answers


Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Failure to certify takeover and resultant effect on delay damages?

0 votes
We completed a civil engineering project under ECC(3).  There were two large structure foundations on the site and then other plinths and access roads. There were 3 completion dates defined, one for each of the structure foundations and one for the remainder of the works. The Employer took over both structure foundations before the completion dates.  The Project Manager did not certify the takeovers and has refused to acknowledge them.  The remainder of the works was finished a couple of weeks after the Completion Date for that section.  The PM is now stating that delay damages are due for all 3 sections of the works.  It is clear that no delay damages are due on both structures sections, as the works were taken over.  My question is, given that the PM failed to certify any takeovers, is he entitled to charge delay damages on the remaining works?
asked Feb 1, 2018 in Time by Jamesor (330 points)  

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer
The PM has to certify Completions under clause 30.2 and take over under clause 35.3. It therefore appears that the Project Manager is in breach of these two obligations x 3 times. Neither of these are compensation events and if they were, you would ten have to establish the effect on your Defined Cost.

However, under 35.2, the Employer takes over a part of the works when he begins to use it, except for a reason stated in the Works Information or to suit the Contractor's method of working.

Under X7.3, any delay damages are reduced from the date that the Employer takes over by the amount of benefit that the Employer receives as a proportion of the benefit. I.e. if the Employer is getting full benefit as if he had completely taken it over, the damages are zero.

So the answer, from what you say,  appears to be 'Yes, he can change damages, but only for the remainder of the works, not the structural foundations'.
answered Feb 1, 2018 by Jon Broome (49,960 points)