Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is a free community help desk for construction professionals run by Built Intelligence. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by industry experts.

Do you want to update your skills in NEC3, NEC4, JCT, Procurement, CDM or Project management?

Sign up for one of our free online courses.

4,671 questions

4,954 answers


Register its Free

Download here

FIDIC Yellow Book - Clause 13.3 is Cost used to value a variation?

0 votes
The second last paragraph of Clause 13.3 of the FIDIC Yellow Book states that the Engineer may ask the Contractor to comply with "...any requirements for the recording of Costs" when he requests a Variation to be executed.

By not mentioning any such requirement for the recording of Costs in his instruction (i.e. not even confirming that recording is not required) is the Engineer entitled to consider that the variation can be assessed using something other than the defined term of Cost?  Specifically, a definition of cost which excludes the Contractor's overheads as set out in the Appendix to Tender as a percentage?  The Engineer recognises the profit element however as that is specifically mentioned in the last paragraph of Clause 13.3.

(Clause for definition of Cost is unamended.)
asked Aug 4, 2017 in Plant and Design-Build Contract Yellow Book by anonymous   2 27 44

1 Answer

0 votes
Best answer
The simple answer is no. The opportunity in 13.3 is for the Engineer to require the contractor to separate out the cost incurred in relation to the variation works. The underlying entitlement is still Cost as defined at If no requirement is given then the Cost associated with the variation is not separated out or dealt with any differently to other project Cost.
answered Dec 1, 2017 by Rob Horne (18,680 points)