Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is our free community help desk for construction professionals. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by a panel of industry experts.

4,310 questions

4,511 answers

592 comments

34,767 users

Register its Free

Download here

Definition of practicable and reason for rejection of Clause 31 programme

0 votes
82 views
A range has been given within the subcontract for each Access Date, and the Key Dates have been defined as a duration from when each access is given. As a result, the subcontractor has planned the Clause 31 based on the latest dates within the range.

The contractor has rejected the programme under "the subcontractor's plans are not practicable" as one of the planned Key Dates falls outside the Key Dates defined within the contractor's contract with the employer (not the subcontractor's contract).

Does this situation demonstrate fair use of the term 'practicable' in justifying rejection of the programme?
asked Jul 27 in NEC3 Time by Kevin Cooper (120 points)  
   

1 Answer

0 votes
No. 'Practicable' is defined in my synonym search as "able to be done or put into practice successfully". This seems a reasonable starting point for a definition without looking it up in dictionaries.

Just because it does not fit into the main contractor's programme and commitments does not mean it is impracticable.
answered Jul 27 by Jon Broome (25,100 points)