Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is our free community help desk for construction professionals. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by a panel of industry experts.

4,331 questions

4,533 answers


34,883 users

Register its Free

Download here

NEC3 ECC: Option A missing items on activity schedule, and when can activity schedule be revised?

0 votes
I am the Project Manager on the construction of a new asset for a client. The contract is ECC option A with secondary options X15 and Y(UK)2 being incorporated. The Contractor has submitted his first programme for acceptance in accordance with the contract timescales but now realises he has not priced a 30m length of security fencing, nor is it shown on the programme. Can the Contractor be paid for this fencing.

What happens to the accepted programme now that both the Project Manager and Contractor realise there is an error on it.

A month later the Contractor has sent out some inquiries for some subcontracting piling works, which is Contractor designed to meet a performance specification in the Works Information provided by the employer. The price is 30% more than he has allowed for in his tender. The Contractor is advised by one tendering subcontractor that some alternative piling could be provided at half the quotated price and which meets the performance specification for the piling in the works information.

Can the contractor change the piling method he has priced upon and shown in the accepted programme?

On what grounds can the contractor submit a revision of the activity schedule to the project manager for acceptance?
asked Mar 24, 2017 in NEC3 General by anonymous   3 8

1 Answer

+1 vote
OK three questions in one, so here goes:

1) Contractor is paid in line with completed items on their activity schedule. Fact it is or is not on their programme is kind of irrelevant. If the activity schedule does not include for that stretch of fencing then they will not be paid specifically for it, yet have to provide it if it was in the Works Information at tender stage.

2)If the alternative piling solution meets the Works Information then there is no reason not to go with that and the Contractor would benefit from the value engineering if it is an idea they have come up with for something that is their design responsibility (see exception within 60.1(1)). If however it may be a bit subjective if it complies with Works Information I would get Project Manager buy in that this solution everyone is happy with.

3) and finally, Contractor can provide a revised activity schedule for acceptance if the Contractor changes a planned method of working that means the activity schedule no longer reflects the operations on the Accepted Programme(54.2). The PM should accept that revised activity schedule, unless it is not in line with accepted programme, or does not reflect the total of prices, or costs are not evenly distributed.
answered Mar 24, 2017 by Glenn Hide (33,710 points)