Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
ReachBack is our free community help desk for construction professionals. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by a panel of industry experts.

4,240 questions

4,426 answers

538 comments

34,652 users

Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Removing clauses from Specification for Highway Works (MCDHW 1)

+1 vote
76 views
We overbanded day joints as per Specification for Highway works clause 711. The client has recorded this as a defect as they say it was not a requirement as it was  " Not used" in "Volume 2 , Works Information, 3 Series & Appendices, Appendix 0/3:  LIST OF NUMBERED CLAUSES AND APPENDICES REFFERED TO IN THE SPECIFICATION AND INCUDED IN THE CONTRACT".

Does this mean it removes the Highway Specification clause or should the clause have been removed in" 3 Series & Appendices, Appendix 0/1:  LIST OF NUMBERED CLAUSES AND APPENDICES
asked Aug 26 in NEC3 General by PT  
edited Aug 29
   

2 Answers

0 votes
I would say that having 'Not used' in Appendix 0/3 is an indication that overbanding is not required.

Appendix 0/1 is actually entitled "Contract specific additional, substitute and cancelled clauses, tables and figures included in the contract".  To list here all the clauses that do not apply to a particular contract would be a very time-consuming task and I've never seen it done.

Appendix 7/11 states what BBA/HAPAS Classification is required for each location, so the omission of that Appendix would certainly suggest to me that overbanding isn't required anywhere.
answered Aug 30 by dave meller (840 points)  
0 votes
This question seems to relate more to the Specification for Highways Works than it does to the NEC3.  However, as a SHW user, and while it is difficult to comment fully without seeing your Works Information, I would answer as follows;

The Client appears to have attempted to compile Appendix 0/3 by marking those Appendices that they have not used as "Not Used".  This is a generally accepted method of completing Appendix 0/3 although the notes regarding the Compiler adding "Not Used" were removed in 2014.

Where a particular Specification "Series" is not required in the Works the Appendices would have been marked as "Not Used" to confirm their status and clarify that they are not missing or included in another document.  If a Vehicle Restraint System renewal scheme does not involve, say, new bridge bearings, Appendix 22/1 would be marked "Not Used," refer to Clause 10 of the Standard Preamble

Appendix 0/1 is used to add entirely new Contract specific clauses, revise existing SHW clauses or cancel a clause where it conflicts with something the Client has added elsewhere.  Clauses which are not used, say bridge bearings in my example, would not be marked as cancelled in Appendix 0/1 but you would ignore them given that there are no bearings to install, refer to Clause 9 of the Standard Preamble.

Of course, should the Client amend the Works Information at any time then it would become a positive or negative Compensation Event under 60.1(1).
answered Aug 30 by Brian (430 points)