Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
  • Register
ReachBack is our free community help desk for construction professionals. A library of high-quality questions from real users with answers delivered and curated by a panel of industry experts.

4,161 questions

4,324 answers

491 comments

34,083 users

Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Incorrect PM assumption

+1 vote
51 views
PM makes an assumption about something (eg level of foundation) and turns out his assumption was wrong (level of foundation needed to go deeper), How would Option C deal with this in terms of time and money?
related to an answer for: NEC ECC: PM assumptions
asked May 6 in NEC3 Main options by anonymous  
   

1 Answer

+2 votes
Assuming this assumption was for a compensation event, if it turned out to be different then this difference can be assessed as a new compensation event. This in turn under option C would increase or decrease the target accordingly.

The idea of a PM assumption is to base the quote on that information and then that element can be revisited by either Party if it turns out to be incorrect. It means the initial CE quote will not be as high as the Contractor is pricing less risk, but does mean the Employer still has the additional risk of paying more if the actual is worse than the assumption was.  

Contractor is paid actual Defined Cost they have incurred no matter what- what we are talking about here is the adjustment of the target.
answered May 6 by Glenn Hide (28,020 points)