Expert advice in minutes not days. Register it's free and ask your first question now.
  • Register
ReachBack is a free web based knowledge capture and sharing service, a help desk and library of 1000+ high-quality questions and answers, delivered and curated by a panel of industry experts.

3,970 questions

4,110 answers

417 comments

33,459 users

Register its Free

Download here

NEC ECC: Revising the programme

+1 vote
The Contractor sets off under an Option C target cost with incentivised fee on a demolition project under which they had design responsibility. The Completion Date was agreed as Nov '18.
Their methodology alters dramatically as they approach design completion as their chosen method is shown not to work.
No clause 32 revised programme was ever submitted.
The Contract was amended by agreement removing the target cost and introducing a fixed fee payable on milestone completion. Seen to alleviate the situation at the time.

The revised Contract conditions state "an integrated programme will be collaboratively developed by the Contractor & the PM and is then submitted by the Contractor to the PM for acceptance in accordance with clause 31.3".

The Contractor does not want to submit his programme as a revised clause 31, instead opting to submit it as a clause 32. That means he doesn't want the Completion Date to move from Nov '18 to what is now proposed as planned Completion of Dec '20.

There are no LD's
Milestones will be re-set on the revised programme when accepted allowing the Contractor to earn his fee - this was contemplated by the Contract amendment.
There is no target cost
There are no significant delays other than the initial delay when methodology changed but that was two years ago and is wrapped up in the amended conditions.

What are the consequences for both Contractor and Employer? This amounts to a negative terminal float position, most unusual. Also surely the Contractor is in breach of the revised/amended conditions.
asked 3 days ago in NEC3 Time by APW (300 points)  
   

1 Answer

+1 vote
It is not clear from your comments as to whether or not there was a clause 31 programme. Based on the statement of “a revised clause 31” it would seem that a clause 31 had been submitted. If that is the case then any further submissions will be under the provisions of clause 32.

The submission (and agreement) of clause 31/32 programmes does not effect the Completion Date. Unless the matter is a compensation event then the programme would show planned Completion as December 2020 against a Completion Date of November 2018.

The Employer’s rights in respect of the Contract being late (when he does become late) would depend upon whether secondary option X7 is used or not.

If the Completion Date has been changed as part of the Contract amendment then that is the date that should be shown on the programme.

Whatever the Completion Date is, it is important to get an accepted programme in order to be able to manage any changes that may occur.
answered 3 days ago by dave bates (3,220 points)